Open Society Fund - Lithuania                                                                  
Public Policy Projects

 

 Public  Health > PHYSICIAN PLANNING IN LITHUANIA

PHYSICIAN PLANNING IN LITHUANIA IN 1990-2015
 

Materials (pdf): Atsisiųsti  299 KB

Summary
 

EDITORIAL BOARD:
Dr. A. Gaižauskienė, director, Lithuanian Health Information Center
Prof. V. Grabauskas, chancellor, Kaunas University of Medicine
Prof. Z. Kučinskienė, dean, Medical Faculty, Vilnius University
L. Lovkytė, PhD student, Department of Preventive Medicine, Kaunas University of Medicine
Dr. R. Vaitkienė, head, Secretarial Office, National Board of Health
Prof. Ž. Padaiga, vice-rector for studies, Kaunas University of Medicine
L. Paškevičius, head, Department of Human Resources and Information Management, Ministry of Health
Assoc. Prof. R. Petkevičius, liaison officer, World Health Organization Liaison Office /Lithuania
Assoc. Prof. D. Pūras, head, Center of Children Psychiatry and Social Pediatrics, Vilnius University
Prof. J. Reamy, professor, Xavier University, USA
V. Sinicienė, head, Department of Informatics, State Sickness Fund
M. Stankūnas, PhD student, Department of Social Medicine, Kaunas University of
 

Medicine Physician planning in Lithuania, as in other countries, is a complex and challenging task. No one database or registry of physicians in Lithuania can provide all the needed information in a timely manner. The incomplete information and the inability to link physician databases have limited their usefulness. The database maintained by the Lithuanian Health Information Center is the most current but lacks a breakdown by age or gender. The Physician License Registry maintained by the Ministry of Health will only be updated every five years and would quickly be outdated. The database by the State Sickness Fund contains only a record of services provided and excludes those physicians who do not have contracts with the State Sickness Fund. Without some more comprehensive registry or means to link the existing registry, complete information on the physician workforce in Lithuania is not available.

Physician resource structure in Lithuania and their distribution is unequal and rigid to change. It is necessary to form consistent policy of undergraduate and postgraduate physician training as well as policy of solving geographic maldistribution; a shortage of physicians was observed not only in rural areas, but also in some remote municipalities, in addition, 15% of physicians were more than 60 years old.

Large percentage (17.3%) of enrolled students dropped out from the undergraduate medical studies at Kaunas University of Medicine. A substantial percentage of Kaunas University of Medicine medical graduates were not licensed and even larger percentage was not practicing medicine; the annual drop out rate from the profession was 0.57%. The migration survey indicated that 60.7% of medical residents and 26.8% of physicians intended to leave for the EU or other countries. However, this was a definitive decision of 3.5% of physicians and 2.5% of medical residents. The main reasons for migration was higher salary, better professional opportunities and better quality of life; the first-choice countries were the Nordic countries, United Kingdom and Germany. For medical residents a previous visit abroad for professional reasons increased the risk of going to work abroad significantly (OR – 3.29, 95% CI 1.73-6.27). In the case of physicians, age was the factor that significantly decreased the risk (OR - 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.96); however having friends abroad increased the risk by more than three times (OR – 3.22, 95% CI 1.91-5.42).

The long physician training cycle, significantly reduced enrollments to the Medical Faculties, high student drop out rate from medical studies, the large number of non-licensed and non-practicing medical graduates, the large percentage of female physicians, and the large number of physicians who have reached retirement age lead to the conclusion that the number of physicians in Lithuania will decrease in the next 15 years, going below the target number of physician planning agreed upon in Delphi study. In addition, the first ever survey of medical residents and physicians in Lithuania on their intentions for leaving abroad indicates that the impact on physicians in Lithuania after accession to the European Union and the introduction of its free-movement policy will be tangible. The immigration of physicians from other EU countries is unlikely, with a more likely source of physicians being from less developed Eastern European and former Soviet countries, although the numbers and the impact are not clear at this point.

The multitude of factors facing the physician workforce in Lithuania makes it an absolute necessity not only to continue research on the topic, but also indicates an urgent need to develop a comprehensive physician training and planning policy. Failure to develop a long-range plan will result in an inappropriate number of physicians to care for the population.



Materials (pdf):
Atsisiųsti  299 KB
 

About Culture Education Euro Integration Information Society Public Health
  
English | Lietuviškai
 


Last updated 14-10-2004
© Open Society Fund - Lithuania, 2001